
Most of them I can read. That bottom one I've no idea, it had squids and stuff drawn all over the sheet. Someone must really love their cuttlefish.
Most of these ideas I reckon we should take on board. Roughly, I think this is the translation :
1 - I had reservations on user answers, and think these be manually screened
2 - Is this really suitable for an art gallery? more likely to suit a shipping center( re :P )
3 - Voice Activation / database to ... something
4 - Will the person hear the computer fan ? How willing are people going to be to follow the rules?
5 - Generic comments
6 - Research other projects which are similar
7 - Excellent presentation even though the idea is not too convincing ( maybe the idea just doesnt interest me )
8 - Chance that people will say something things? Limit it to horoscopes to get more generalised response. Measure cost, dont trust megan ( get broke? ) The recieving box doesnt need to use voices to choose
That's as best as I could decipher them. . . They say the more creative you are, the messier your handwriting , we must have a very creative class ;)
On top of these responses, during the presentation, a few people had suggestions.
- Research the usenet oracle ( http://cgi.cs.indiana.edu/~oracle/index.cgi )
- Limit / Eliminate voice recognition
- Use Physical Answer System ( eg, tarot cards, crystal ball )
- User answer screening ( "was this helpful ? yes, no " )
- Manual screening of answers each night
- Two shadows - one for question, one for answer ( two voices )
So guys, comments / ideas as to where to take it from here ?
1 comment:
you seem to have covered everything there. Good work Anthony
Post a Comment